Did you consider writing the same reply to the comment I was answering to (that 0.2 is 35% lower than 0.27). Because the same argument about ranges and variatio

Did you consider writing the same reply to the comment I was answering to (that 0.2 is 35% lower than 0.27). Because the same argument about ranges and variations applies. Except that that comment was left at the firm conclusion that 0.2 is more conservative than 0.27, while my reply continued with the statement that I do not think the IPCC was wrong, but rather right.