3 ms·
For anyone else who's curious what their standards are, the guidelines seem to be here: http://unicode.org/emoji/proposals.html#selection_factors http://unicode
by rococode 8y ago
For anyone else who's curious what their standards are, the guidelines seem to be here: http://unicode.org/emoji/proposals.html#selection_factors http://unicode.org/emoji/proposals.html#selection_factors
I guess they could say it falls under "Already representable" since we have eggplant emojis lmao. I would have guessed that they want to avoid emojis that are generally used in crude/offensive contexts, but there's a middle finger emoji so...
- grandmczeb 8y ago> I guess they could say it falls under "Already representable" since we have eggplant emojis lmao. By that logic there's no need for the smiley emoji since we already have :). I expect that the given reason would be that vendors would be unlikely to implement it. That's at least plausible, but if the UTC has ever given an actual reason I'd like to hear it.