14 ms·
I don't think that's a reasonable conclusion to draw from the fact the TV wasn't pure noise. Why would the agent not be able to determine that every noisy frame
by Jabbles 8y ago
I don't think that's a reasonable conclusion to draw from the fact the TV wasn't pure noise. Why would the agent not be able to determine that every noisy frame was one step away from every other?
- mooneater 8y agoThe google paper uses memory. You cant remember a never ending set of 2D random noise, there are limitless variations.
- Jabbles 8y agoThey don't remember all the previous scenes, just ones which are "novel" enough. But how do we decide whether the agent is seeing the same thing as an existing memory? Checking for an exact match could be meaningless: in a realistic environment, the agent rarely sees exactly the same thing twice. For example, even if the agent returned to exactly the same room, it would still see this room under a different angle compared to its memories. Instead of checking for an exact match in memory, we use a deep neural network that is trained to measure how similar two experiences are.
- mooneater 8y agoOk. Though it still depends on limited number of tv shows. If there is an unlimited number of shows and the agent walks right up to it, I think its still trapped.
- jhurliman 8y agoAren’t we all. http://rickandmorty.wikia.com/wiki/Interdimensional_Cable http://rickandmorty.wikia.com/wiki/Interdimensional_Cable