I think you misread what I said, which could have been worded better. > There are plenty of things that kids do NOT recover from and we now know that moderate

I think you misread what I said, which could have been worded better. > There are plenty of things that kids do NOT recover from and we now know that moderate marijuana use is NOT one of them. i.e. Kids don't recover from everything (as OP stated) but we now know they can recover from moderate marijuana use. The original comment was trying to dismiss this work as trivial, I was trying to prove otherwise. Also, no one made any claim that kid's don't recover from anything. You're arguing with yourself. I'm simply trying to state that having proof that kids can recover (like this paper provides) is necessary. I'm specifically arguing that we shouldn't make overgeneralizations and assumptions without supporting evidence.