4 ms·
I want to think that most of the cheap mass market paperbacks I used to buy were in the vicinity of 4" x 6", and about 300 pages long, which is not far off from
by thrower123 8y ago
I want to think that most of the cheap mass market paperbacks I used to buy were in the vicinity of 4" x 6", and about 300 pages long, which is not far off from these, and most importantly, were convenient to stuff in a coat pocket or the back pocket of a pair of jeans. At that kind of size and weight, they weren't at all painful to read for an extended time. And they were so cheap that it wasn't a tragedy if I happened to drop one in the mud coming back from my deerstand or it fell overboard fishing.
I don't really buy fiction on paper anymore, but all the paperbacks I see in the stores or airports are much bigger. Part of it is ballooning length, but there's a lot more printed at something like halfway between a trade paperback and the old mass-markets. Or those really awful awkward tall narrow paperbacks that remind me of the aspect ratio of the original Microsoft Surfaces.
- joe5150 8y agoDo you have an example of what you mean by "tall narrow" paperbacks?
- thrower123 8y agoThere's was a run of Vince Flynn and Steven King paperbacks that were really bad for a while, but I'm at work and my library is at home. But this[1] pretty much shows the difference. It's really glaring next to older pulpy paperbacks that are undersized compared to the standard size to begin with. [1] https://www.reddit.com/r/witcher/comments/5p8bne/this_is_just_a_bit_annoying_book_size_issue/ https://www.reddit.com/r/witcher/comments/5p8bne/this_is_jus...
- joe5150 8y agoI see what you mean. I don’t care for those either.