4 ms·
There is nothing wrong. It's just that they don't contribute to success. Now you might ask, what's wrong with not striving for success? Nothing, I suppose. It's
by throwaway8879 8y ago
There is nothing wrong. It's just that they don't contribute to success. Now you might ask, what's wrong with not striving for success? Nothing, I suppose. It's nice however to be able to reach one's fullest potential.
- rv-de 8y agoThat's such a proud and confident thing to say. No need for a throwaway account. I would argue that striving for success is often the best way to actually not reach one's fullest potential.
- throwaway8879 8y agoYou misunderstand me. I'm not making value judgements. Success and non-success means the same thing in the end. But while we're here, might as well experience a drive for success? Or smoke up and be lazy, that's fine too. I've done both and don't necessarily prefer one over another. I really don't think pride or confidence comes into play here.
- thecatspaw 8y agobut its better chances than trying to reach averageness.
- ionised 8y agoWhile I agree that spending your free time sitting around, smoking weed and watching Netflix is a poor use of your time, I'd be wary of defining for yourself what the 'fullest potential' of another person is.