"An Alternative History" would suggest that the actual history would be mentioned somewhere in the article. The Innovator's Dilemma book doesn't even get a ment

"An Alternative History" would suggest that the actual history would be mentioned somewhere in the article. The Innovator's Dilemma book doesn't even get a mention. It's totally fine to have a contrarian point of view but you have to accurately represent the opposing view point. That wasn't done here.