4 ms·
I share that sentiment. HA and automated failover seems to be either simple because the application supports it, or really really hard. Stateless applications
by tetha 8y ago
I share that sentiment. HA and automated failover seems to be either simple because the application supports it, or really really hard.
Stateless applications are simple. Systems built with this in mind, like cassandra, elasticsearch, redis+sentinel just do it right after two or three settings like minimum quorum sizes.
But if you have systems without this builtin, like NFS, Mysql, Postgres? I guess we don't hear about the successful automated failures, but we surely hear about really messy automated failover attempts.
- ADefenestrator 8y agoEven in cases like Cassandra it's far from flawless, mostly due to the massive complexity. Failover works great, compaction works great, schema changes work great, repairs work... but what happens if two of those happen at once? Or all of them? There have been quite a few bugs over the years that involve corner cases when the various coordination and deferred-work systems interact.