3 ms·
Disclaimer: Red Hat employee That's not entirely fair. Canonical has almost zero kernel contributions, while IBM is the #4 top corporate contributor. And Can
by dralley 8y ago
Disclaimer: Red Hat employee
That's not entirely fair. Canonical has almost zero kernel contributions, while IBM is the #4 top corporate contributor.
And Canonical keeps some "important" things proprietary, like the server code behind Snaps.
- bryanlarsen 8y agoAs I said, the old Red Hat was a much better corporate citizen than Canonical is. I hope the new Red Hat ends up doing a "reverse takeover" of IBM. Kernel contributions are a really bad metric, they're like 1% of a distribution and get lots of attention. IBM isn't an Nvidia, but they're not a Red Hat or Canonical either.