4 ms·
The problem was not kink. The problem was not Burning Man. The problem was: a)Mentioning his relationship status ("poly") to a candidate during the intervie
by romwell 8y ago
The problem was not kink. The problem was not Burning Man.
The problem was:
a)Mentioning his relationship status ("poly") to a candidate during the interview
b)Asking for a sexual favor off-site while the candidate was still waiting for response
This is textbook discrimination.
It's good to see him go.[1]
[1]https://www.axios.com/executive-accused-of-harassment-at-alphabet-x-unit-is-out-6f583d1e-91e3-4a8b-ae2b-51fd4517ec74.html https://www.axios.com/executive-accused-of-harassment-at-alp...
- KaiserPro 8y agoIt is indeed wrong, for all these points. Even if you subscribe to the "its ok, its a cultural thing" Its wrong for the company Why? because he is suggesting that said person can be hired because of a quality unrelated to what the company needs. It is at this point that "he is an exec and therefore creates value at the company far out weighing this 'temporary impairment of judgement'" becomes null and void. His judgement is causing shareholder harm. Therefore the company should find someone who is able to provide the company with better value and judgement.