>> It’s possible for Orchestrator to implement topologies that applications are unable to support, therefore care must be taken to align Orchestrator’s configu

>> It’s possible for Orchestrator to implement topologies that applications are unable to support, therefore care must be taken to align Orchestrator’s configuration with application-level expectations. So basically Orchestrator acted correctly but application layer is not nicely integrated with it? Sounds like something not well designed on application side, which offests the whole point of global consensus. Not much detail provided for what exactly went wrong on this though. They mentioned that they'll take extra care of this but I'm still very concerned about the reality that two systems (orchestrator & app) are so loosely coupled.