There's legal requirements, and then there's ethical requirements, which are not necessarily the same. If they are supposedly vetting renters, then it should b

There's legal requirements, and then there's ethical requirements, which are not necessarily the same. If they are supposedly vetting renters, then it should be incumbent upon them to stand behind their vetting. They should also very unequivocally state that if the renter just walks off with your gear you will not be compensated. So sure, maybe you're getting repaid by KitSplit because you wrote a blog post about it, but what about everybody else who this has happened to. I doubt you're the only one. If they improve their practices because of this that's great, but the fact that it took months for them to come around, and only after they got some bad publicity, is not a good sign.