This looks like a cry of MPEG "we are not dead yet". Discussing the viability of a codec that is still 2 years out and throwing a comparison like that in the m

This looks like a cry of MPEG "we are not dead yet". Discussing the viability of a codec that is still 2 years out and throwing a comparison like that in the mix seems dishonest. Also every "graph" drawn is deceptive and seems clearly biased in favor of vvc (the most obvious one is "decoder install base" and "ecosystem adoption" where vvc didn't score 0) But I will be happy as long as we have a good competition in the codec space.