3 ms·
Whether or not the earth can sustain 100 billion humans was the scope of the statement, so I don't think resources other than food is a separate issue. I agree
by bootlooped 8y ago
Whether or not the earth can sustain 100 billion humans was the scope of the statement, so I don't think resources other than food is a separate issue.
I agree with the assertion that humanity is more sustainable (all other things being equal) vegan or vegetarian rather than omnivorous, but it's going to far to suggest we could just swap in humans for livestock.