3 ms·
I don't know enough about software to contest that statement, but I suspect you could be underestimating the the complexity of what Photoshop does. We're also
by stupidbird 8y ago
I don't know enough about software to contest that statement, but I suspect you could be underestimating the the complexity of what Photoshop does.
We're also talking about multi-gig files. Outside of media the occurrence of an individual application file this large is pretty small. It's not like you can reliably play a 4K video file on many entry-level machines either.
In a similar vein, I would argue that it's a better indictment of the industry that I sometimes have to close Chrome because it's hogging more resources than Photoshop.
- slivym 8y agoI think the obvious point is that whilst what photoshop does is very complex and computationally intensive, it's not new. The vast majority of the functionality in an average photoshop file is the same as was in the product 15 years ago. We really have reached the point of diminishing returns. And doing those tasks 15 years ago wasn't slow, so it's questionable why photoshop hasn't scaled in speed with the hardware.