3 ms·
I get your point, yet I'm not sure it reflects the (nuanced, as always) reality. They're not really in a bubble: they're exposed to ads outside of home (TV at
by bpizzi 8y ago
I get your point, yet I'm not sure it reflects the (nuanced, as always) reality.
They're not really in a bubble: they're exposed to ads outside of home (TV at other places, Cinema, street boards, on city buses...).
I hope that this clear separation between "no ads/home" and "ads/outside" is sufficient to cross a threshold in their mind which makes them thinks "Ads are not meant to be ubiquitous".
And when I notice that this threshold is being crossed, then I'm here to tell them "looks, choosing if we're exposed to ads in on us!".
And I hope that this low-age learning will help them later in life (more or less >12/15, imo).
- LitFan 8y ago> I hope that this clear separation between "no ads/home" and "ads/outside" is sufficient to cross a threshold in their mind which makes them thinks "Ads are not meant to be ubiquitous". This helps me understand. You've convinced me of your approach - thank you. :)