> it's an extremely well known license Extremely well known? It was created only 6 months ago, and practically no one had heard of until a couple months ago wh

> it's an extremely well known license Extremely well known? It was created only 6 months ago, and practically no one had heard of until a couple months ago when Redis Labs adopted it, to much controversy. > If I want to restrict others from selling my product I will do so. Of course, and the article says so. The question is whether it OK for you to use a non open-source license (by most common interpretations), and yet call yourself open-source source, enjoying the PR benefits.