3 ms·

You've still provided no evidence? These are all simply opinions and without any hard evidence you can't even really prove assange didn't get the emails in late

You've still provided no evidence? These are all simply opinions and without any hard evidence you can't even really prove assange didn't get the emails in late September and then released them in early October ASAP. Mueller isn't making much if anything public and we're told to prepare for disappointment regarding the whole Russia narrative [1]. This kind of undermines the whole thing. [1] https://www.politico.com/story/2018/10/19/mueller-investigation-findings-914754 https://www.politico.com/story/2018/10/19/mueller-investigat...

macspoofing 8y ago
>These are all simply opinions and without any hard evidence Sure, some of it is speculation on my part but not much. We know WikiLeaks is a dump for Russian intelligence. WikiLeaks coordinating with the Russians goes all the way back to Snowden when Assange brokered asylum for him. We have multitudes of data points on that including statements from most Western intelligence agencies, including American, German, French and British. Wikipedia has a nice summary: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WikiLeaks#Allegations_of_Russian_influence https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WikiLeaks#Allegations_of_Russi... All fake news? >Mueller isn't making much if anything public and we're told to prepare for disappointment regarding the whole Russia narrative I never thought that Trump coordinated with the Russians. Putin hated Clinton and Russia has a policy to fuck with the West - those two things are enough to explain them helping Trump without needing Trump to be directly involved. I do suspect that Trump may have engaged in some shady deals in Russia back when he was a private citizen and maybe there's a chance that the Russians have something damaging on Trump - but I freely admit this is just speculation on my part. But the Trump collusion is a separate question to Wikileaks coordinating with the Russians or being a front for Russian intelligence.

macspoofing 8y ago

>These are all simply opinions and without any hard evidence Sure, some of it is speculation on my part but not much. We know WikiLeaks is a dump for Russian intelligence. WikiLeaks coordinating with the Russians goes all the way back to Snowden when Assange brokered asylum for him. We have multitudes of data points on that including statements from most Western intelligence agencies, including American, German, French and British. Wikipedia has a nice summary: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WikiLeaks#Allegations_of_Russian_influence https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WikiLeaks#Allegations_of_Russi... All fake news? >Mueller isn't making much if anything public and we're told to prepare for disappointment regarding the whole Russia narrative I never thought that Trump coordinated with the Russians. Putin hated Clinton and Russia has a policy to fuck with the West - those two things are enough to explain them helping Trump without needing Trump to be directly involved. I do suspect that Trump may have engaged in some shady deals in Russia back when he was a private citizen and maybe there's a chance that the Russians have something damaging on Trump - but I freely admit this is just speculation on my part. But the Trump collusion is a separate question to Wikileaks coordinating with the Russians or being a front for Russian intelligence.