The linked NYT article states pretty clearly that she was accusing him of coercion, and that Google determined that accusation to have merit. This article by bu

The linked NYT article states pretty clearly that she was accusing him of coercion, and that Google determined that accusation to have merit. This article by buzzfeed adds that there was a second such allegation, from a different woman: > following an investigation into an allegation that he had coerced another employee to perform oral sex on him. To not acknowledge these facts clearly stated in every article strikes me as bad faith rather than confusion.