>I fail to see what isn't "conservative" about that. I believe the "not conservative" part is that they're giving massive amounts of public money, both directl

>I fail to see what isn't "conservative" about that. I believe the "not conservative" part is that they're giving massive amounts of public money, both directly and via free infrastructure, to a private business. That's basically the opposite of any sort of free-market capitalism. According to standard conservative thought & rhetoric that should've been applied to gov't debt paydown, legitimate gov't functions (roads, schools) or rebated to taxpayers.