3 ms·

"This is where the Red Hat acquisition comes in: while IBM will certainly be happy to have the company’s cash-generating RHEL subscription business, the real pr

"This is where the Red Hat acquisition comes in: while IBM will certainly be happy to have the company’s cash-generating RHEL subscription business, the real prize is Openshift, a software suite for building and managing Kubernetes containers." Small problem with that. Most of the progressive enterprises are trying to move AWAY from containers to fully serverless architectures (Lambda, Google functions, Azure, etc.) Kubernetes is still hot but the momentum is definitely with Lambda and its ilk.

kamaal 8y ago
>>Most of the progressive enterprises are trying to move AWAY from containers to fully serverless architectures (Lambda, Google functions, Azure, etc.) Serverless runs on? Also Lambda is not a replacement for your webservices. Lambda is very expensive for non-trivial scaling requirements. And yeah bulk of the backends in the industry aren't always web based products.
lima 8y ago
Enterprises moving to serverless are rare. Many still struggle to move off dedicated infrastructure or mainframes. And serverless is a risky bet, anyway - vendor lock in, costs and security being important concerns.
freehunter 8y ago
I'm a consultant who works with enterprises of all sizes (all sizes that could still be considered "enterprise" sized at least) and I've only encountered one that has used anything serverless, and then only in one production application. And I touch basically every IT application/environment across the entire business. Now I don't want to say my experience is perfectly indicative of what big companies are doing in general, but I certainly haven't noticed this trend. Even containers are just starting to catch on in the enterprise market, and a lot of enterprise software doesn't currently support containerization.
- AndyNemmity 8y ago
  I was an enterprise consultant, and I'll vouch for your experiences. It's moving in that direction, but it's a few years out of what people think. Like, hdfs is far more common now. Technology starts at the larger companies, and trickles down over time.
  - user5994461 8y ago
    We actually have serverless, that's called cgi scripts. Very stable and proven technology. But for some reasons, nobody try to use that anymore or even think of it.

kamaal 8y ago

>>Most of the progressive enterprises are trying to move AWAY from containers to fully serverless architectures (Lambda, Google functions, Azure, etc.) Serverless runs on? Also Lambda is not a replacement for your webservices. Lambda is very expensive for non-trivial scaling requirements. And yeah bulk of the backends in the industry aren't always web based products.

lima 8y ago

Enterprises moving to serverless are rare. Many still struggle to move off dedicated infrastructure or mainframes. And serverless is a risky bet, anyway - vendor lock in, costs and security being important concerns.

freehunter 8y ago

I'm a consultant who works with enterprises of all sizes (all sizes that could still be considered "enterprise" sized at least) and I've only encountered one that has used anything serverless, and then only in one production application. And I touch basically every IT application/environment across the entire business. Now I don't want to say my experience is perfectly indicative of what big companies are doing in general, but I certainly haven't noticed this trend. Even containers are just starting to catch on in the enterprise market, and a lot of enterprise software doesn't currently support containerization.

AndyNemmity 8y ago
I was an enterprise consultant, and I'll vouch for your experiences. It's moving in that direction, but it's a few years out of what people think. Like, hdfs is far more common now. Technology starts at the larger companies, and trickles down over time.
- user5994461 8y ago
  We actually have serverless, that's called cgi scripts. Very stable and proven technology. But for some reasons, nobody try to use that anymore or even think of it.