2 ms·
> A variation of the http/2 name would IMHO make more sense, e.g. http/2q or something, since it's not changing the HTTP semantics. HTTP/2 didn't change semant
by gsnedders 8y ago
> A variation of the http/2 name would IMHO make more sense, e.g. http/2q or something, since it's not changing the HTTP semantics.
HTTP/2 didn't change semantics, either. We literally only have one version of HTTP semantics, and a variety of transports for it.