4 ms·
True, but for rsync's case of setting the mtime of a file, performance of this logic is utterly insignificant.
by vortico 8y ago
True, but for rsync's case of setting the mtime of a file, performance of this logic is utterly insignificant.
- bayindirh 8y ago"Everything is fast for small n." -Knuth. While syncing some million files, I'm sure it'll have an impact tho. P.S.: Yes, we use it for a million files, regularly.
- blibble 8y agoit's probably not noticeable for a million files the syscall is going to be many, many orders of magnitude slower than the difference between a direct and an indirect call
- vortico 8y agoWith trivial method() functions, you could speed through that loop a million times in a millisecond.
- bayindirh 8y agoIIRC, switch statements bigger than a certain sizes are compiled to jump tables. So it's just a static jump after the code finds a working method. In theory, it's a very cheap piece of assembly after that point.