3 ms·
I grieve the most that this will really weaken the argument for commercial free software. We could always say, look at Red Hat, they don't sell a drop of non-fr
by jordigh 8y ago
I grieve the most that this will really weaken the argument for commercial free software. We could always say, look at Red Hat, they don't sell a drop of non-free software. It's possible to be free and commercial!
I doubt Red Hat will continue to operate this way, especially if they are receiving money from IBM's other ventures. I hope there's room for another Red Hat in this world.
- colordrops 8y agoRed Hat used to sell non-free software using the freemium model with Redhat Enterprise. Is that no longer the case?
- jordigh 8y agoNo, RHEL isn't freemium. They sold you access to the source code. You also have the right to redistribute RHEL, which is how CentOS happened. I understand they did threaten to terminate support if you redistributed, but they couldn't stop you from doing so if you so chose.
- dingaling 8y agoThey also require a support contract to view their bug tracker.