2 ms·
I find it hard to follow these kind of no-chat articles since they usually come off as a bit contrarian rather than something that makes sense: * Why does a ch
by jahaja 8y ago
I find it hard to follow these kind of no-chat articles since they usually come off as a bit contrarian rather than something that makes sense:
* Why does a chat blackout naturally follow a fear of missing out?
* What's different from the good ol' IRC days? Mute the channels, see them as transient, and focus on 1on1 conversations.
* Important conversations should not be solely communicated through a short-lived channel chat, but be summarized through email or whatever.
* You're already missing out on all the 1on1 conversations you're not in.
And I write this as someone who chronically checks for slack updates.
Maybe the "fear of missing out" isn't really about missing out on important information, as I initially thought, but about missing out on participation and the inevitable social/office dynamics around that?
- beberlei 8y agoAuthor here. I have never used IRC in a company, so I can't compare. Slack is the topic, because we used Slack. If we have had used IRC or HipChat or Microsoft Teams, then maybe we have come to the same conclusion. Yes, summarization is important. However switching to E-Mail causes all its problems. New colleagues don't have the mails for example. Basecamp has chat and a forum/message board or todolists. We can easily link between these.