3 ms·
It pushes for higher quality. It allows me to get food from real restaurants that didn't offer delivery otherwise. Same as sitting in. That being said, I agree
by user5994461 8y ago
It pushes for higher quality. It allows me to get food from real restaurants that didn't offer delivery otherwise. Same as sitting in.
That being said, I agreed that the margin is huge.
- cm2187 8y agoThat's deliveroo. Uber is rather your local mcdonald's. My experience is that the service of Uber eats is disastrous. They hire drivers that do not speak a word of english and more often than not don't want to step out of their vehicle. Deliveroo has an OK service.
- user5994461 8y agoIn London, pretty much all restaurants are on both. It was actually crazy when Uber Eats appeared last year or so. In a few months they captured all the restaurants from Deliveroo and another truckload of restaurants/chains that never did delivery before. That should be taught in business class. The power of a brand, destroy your competitors and double the market in a few months.
- daemin 8y agoRealistically if a restaurant uses one delivery service then it's pretty easy to start being on another. So as I've seen most restaurants have one or more such services plastered on their walls.
- lozenge 8y agoI don't think it was the brand, but rather the VC funding likely allowed them to offer restaurants better terms.
- meowface 8y agoIt's the opposite for my region (DC area). Lots of high-quality restaurants that otherwise don't deliver are on Uber Eats, while GrubHub and Deliveroo is mostly bad fast food and pizza.