In the sense of the "ideal" of freedom of speech, sure. In practice, almost everyone uses this to argue that some speech they don't like should be suppressed, e

In the sense of the "ideal" of freedom of speech, sure. In practice, almost everyone uses this to argue that some speech they don't like should be suppressed, e.g. Joyent should be compelled to host Gab. Literally no one is a free speech absolutist. In the sense that I originally meant it — the legal sense — this indeed has nothing to do with freedom of speech.