You assume they actually interact with the locals to make the world a more connected place. That doesn't happen by tourists just showing up and doing touristy t

You assume they actually interact with the locals to make the world a more connected place. That doesn't happen by tourists just showing up and doing touristy things. In fact, the reverse can happen as locals get priced out because of tourists and they start to actively blame the tourists for the issue. Then, those who stay blame them for their behavior, which certainly doesn't lend itself to a residential neighborhood, which just makes those people dislike tourists as well. Definitely the opposite of being 'more connected'. > The multiple guests travelling to this place is more important than one neighbor's bad experience. You're assuming that only one neighbor has a bad experience. What if it's all of them, except the short-term residents? I also disagree that the experience of the guests is more important.