4 ms·
Wow, this is definitely worth mentioning. Explains why the OP was incredibly biased towards Google while putting down one of their competitors.
by fucking_tragedy 8y ago
Wow, this is definitely worth mentioning. Explains why the OP was incredibly biased towards Google while putting down one of their competitors.
- utopcell 8y agoBiased towards Google ? I stated my opinion: I _trust_ Google. I do _not_ trust a company that chooses to increase their revenue by numerous smearing campaigns. As for putting down a 'competitor' [sic]: Google owns 'duck.com' via its On2 acquisition. What do they show if you visit the page ? "If you meant to visit the search engine DuckDuckGo, click here." "The OP" works at Google precisely because they think Google is a force of good in the world, a company I'm proud to work for, not the other way around.
- fucking_tragedy 8y agoThis is what you said, and it's clearly biased because you work for Google. That is the definition of bias. > Would you trust Google, a company that has delivered real value, has helped democratize access to knowledge at a global scale and has everything to lose if it was revealed that they are misusing sensitive information