3 ms·

Are you utopcell@google.com as in [1]? If so, I would say that's worth mentioning. [1] https://research.yahoo.com/mobstor/publication_attachments/wsdm-cc-20171

Are you utopcell@google.com as in [1]? If so, I would say that's worth mentioning. [1] https://research.yahoo.com/mobstor/publication_attachments/wsdm-cc-20171128.pdf https://research.yahoo.com/mobstor/publication_attachments/w...

utopcell 8y ago
Indeed I am. I'm sure your first thought was to use Google to find this information.
- Mononokay 8y ago
  You shill on HN for basically every Google-related thread, so it's not like they'd need to use Google to find out you had connections to them. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17094934 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17094934 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18267828 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18267828 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18179176 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18179176
  - utopcell 8y ago
    Solid argument. Everyone that has a positive opinion about Google works for them. You might want to search for the threads of my not positive opinions as well though.
fucking_tragedy 8y ago
Wow, this is definitely worth mentioning. Explains why the OP was incredibly biased towards Google while putting down one of their competitors.
- utopcell 8y ago
  Biased towards Google ? I stated my opinion: I _trust_ Google. I do _not_ trust a company that chooses to increase their revenue by numerous smearing campaigns. As for putting down a 'competitor' [sic]: Google owns 'duck.com' via its On2 acquisition. What do they show if you visit the page ? "If you meant to visit the search engine DuckDuckGo, click here." "The OP" works at Google precisely because they think Google is a force of good in the world, a company I'm proud to work for, not the other way around.
  - fucking_tragedy 8y ago
    This is what you said, and it's clearly biased because you work for Google. That is the definition of bias. > Would you trust Google, a company that has delivered real value, has helped democratize access to knowledge at a global scale and has everything to lose if it was revealed that they are misusing sensitive information

utopcell 8y ago

Indeed I am. I'm sure your first thought was to use Google to find this information.

Mononokay 8y ago
You shill on HN for basically every Google-related thread, so it's not like they'd need to use Google to find out you had connections to them. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17094934 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17094934 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18267828 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18267828 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18179176 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18179176
- utopcell 8y ago
  Solid argument. Everyone that has a positive opinion about Google works for them. You might want to search for the threads of my not positive opinions as well though.

fucking_tragedy 8y ago

Wow, this is definitely worth mentioning. Explains why the OP was incredibly biased towards Google while putting down one of their competitors.

utopcell 8y ago
Biased towards Google ? I stated my opinion: I _trust_ Google. I do _not_ trust a company that chooses to increase their revenue by numerous smearing campaigns. As for putting down a 'competitor' [sic]: Google owns 'duck.com' via its On2 acquisition. What do they show if you visit the page ? "If you meant to visit the search engine DuckDuckGo, click here." "The OP" works at Google precisely because they think Google is a force of good in the world, a company I'm proud to work for, not the other way around.
- fucking_tragedy 8y ago
  This is what you said, and it's clearly biased because you work for Google. That is the definition of bias. > Would you trust Google, a company that has delivered real value, has helped democratize access to knowledge at a global scale and has everything to lose if it was revealed that they are misusing sensitive information