2 ms·
From the article: > Note: this article was edited on the 21/12/16 because Sean's mate was going to get fired and we really like that guy. I remember reading t
by aravindet 8y ago
From the article:
> Note: this article was edited on the 21/12/16 because Sean's mate was going to get fired and we really like that guy.
I remember reading that a previous Vice story about Naomi Watts published off-the-record details that put her at risk from the Chinese government.
Fucking over sources for no particular reason looks like a trend with Vice reporters.
- 3pt14159 8y agoVice is a particularly skeezy publication. Their own reporters have been fucked over and the founders aren't just corrupt (audience size and other fraud) one of them is the leader of a right wing hate group which I'm not even going to name because I fear I'll show up in their web-crawlers and they'll harass me. There is a guy I know that was the subject of an Oscar shortlisted documentary[0] that has a whole website dedicated to it.[1] I really think his reporting on them contributed to Disney's pullout of the acquisition. There are good reporters that work there, but that's more by random chance than by culture. [0] Or nominated? I always get those two confused. Anyway it was Frame 394. [1] notvice.com
- gpm 8y agoDo you mean Naomi Wu?