> doesn't invent DSLs Systemd didn't invent a DSL. It uses the existing config language from D-Bus (whether or not you think that's a good language is another

> doesn't invent DSLs Systemd didn't invent a DSL. It uses the existing config language from D-Bus (whether or not you think that's a good language is another matter). > uses proper architecture with clearly defined boundaries What boundaries in systemd aren't clearly defined? > allowing custom application-specific management What do you mean by this?