2 ms·
The latter I think makes sense (disallowing characters like *, for example). We have a reasonable concept of special characters (just look at the top 5 used she
by esotericn 8y ago
The latter I think makes sense (disallowing characters like *, for example). We have a reasonable concept of special characters (just look at the top 5 used shells or something).
The former I'm not so sure. It's very 'ascii-centric', for lack of a better term. I think in order for that to make sense you'd need to disable UTF8 filenames entirely; the filesystem doesn't know, or care, that there's a relationship between a and A and any number of other Unicode variants, and why should it?
- maxxxxx 8y agoI know. Technically a file name should just be a sequence of any characters. But from observation I have seen people spend an enormous amount of time tracking down simple typos so I am not sure the flexibility is worth it.