> Static types and Object Oriented Programming are better ways, I think most of us will agree? No.... I'm with you on static typing but disagree with OO. I k

> Static types and Object Oriented Programming are better ways, I think most of us will agree? No.... I'm with you on static typing but disagree with OO. I know other developers I strongly respect with every permutation. Personally, I probably wouldn't object to OO so much if Java weren't such a commonly taught first language, which gets right back to the discussion at hand.