5 ms·
Programming as a profession is strange because we each do such different things but all tools are available to us all the time. Imagine if this were true in the
by zwkrt 8y ago
Programming as a profession is strange because we each do such different things but all tools are available to us all the time. Imagine if this were true in the physical world; you would read arcticles written by accountants like "Dynamite Considered Harmful" with rebuttals titled "Why Dynamite Matters" by construction engineers...
- sam0x17 8y agoThis is fantastically imaginative. I love it.
- zzzeek 8y agothis is the most genius thing I've ever read on hacker news.
- xtrapolate 8y agoIt's almost as if things aren't really black or white, there's usually plenty of grey in-between. Things like use-cases, scenarios, trade-offs, intricacies. I find it awkward that a security shop would publish an article using that language - I would personally be embarrassed.
- jolmg 8y ago> I would personally be embarrassed The rest of the comment is good, it adds to the argument, and I even agree with it, but there is no reason for this to be here. It doesn't add anything; it's just like calling names. From the HN guidelines: > Don't be snarky. > When disagreeing, please reply to the argument instead of calling names. "That is idiotic; 1 + 1 is 2, not 3" can be shortened to "1 + 1 is 2, not 3." EDIT: To be downvoted like so for reminding people of the guidelines, HN sure is changing. I guess no good thing lasts forever.
- deleted 8y ago[deleted]
- taneq 8y agoYou see this all the time here on HN. "Interpreted languages are useless" coming from the systems and embedded people. "You can't call yourself a developer if you're not an expert in [FOTM web framework]" from the web devs. "Mutability is evil and reassigning variables is a sign of incompetence" from the functional programming sect.