4 ms·
Right, because the spokesman for a state government office knows best when it comes to software UX design. Oh boy.
by glitcher 8y ago
Right, because the spokesman for a state government office knows best when it comes to software UX design. Oh boy.
- talmand 8y agoSpeaking of the alleged problem as reported is not necessarily a comment on the UX, it can be simply a reporting of the problem.
- afarrell 8y agoI’m not someone who believes that you should be able to pitch manure, plan an invasion, and conn a ship. But someone can have standards for UX design without knowing about how to execute any of it. An employee of a procurement department certainly should be as part of their core competency. A spokesperson for a government procurement department should be able to communicate that if it is something the department values
- wavefunction 8y agoForgive me if I prematurely discount the UX opinions of a Gregg Abbott political appointee explaining that a laughably amateur user experience is the fault of the voters of the opposing party.
- afarrell 8y agoOh we don't disagree on that. I'm saying that this appointee should be better at UX evaluation, not that we should take their opinion as worth anything.
- r00fus 8y agoIt's a basic unit test: if it's possible to lose inputs due to natural usage, the it's a bug. Where I come from, data corruption is the worst severity of bug. If you see an input selection as data, this is clearly a data corruption severity.
- Technetium_Hat 8y ago"you're holding it wrong."