I think you're implying that, #1: There is a trend where public companies face unreasonable or unfair accountability laws, and #2: This case is an example of th

I think you're implying that, #1: There is a trend where public companies face unreasonable or unfair accountability laws, and #2: This case is an example of that. Am I off base? If not, #1 sounds like a reasonable argument could be made, though it would be better made explicitly rather than implicitly. #2, on the other hand, definitely needs elaboration.