3 ms·
Moats and walls are pretty good analogies here. The magnitude of the barrier provided by a moat was considerable in the 1300's. By the late 20th century, it was
by stcredzero 8y ago
Moats and walls are pretty good analogies here. The magnitude of the barrier provided by a moat was considerable in the 1300's. By the late 20th century, it was far less.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bWMrY49qqDw https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bWMrY49qqDw
In the 11th century, a wooden palisade or an earthen berm fortification could be held for something like a half year. By the end of WWII, it constituted a delaying tactic.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rhino_tank https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rhino_tank
A phase change happened with military tactics in the lead-up to the 1st half of the 20th century, where the power of mobile mechanized armor and air support greatly reduced the value of fortifications.
That said, I don't think moats are dead. It's just that the time-scales have changed.
- blihp 8y agoThe timescales of the moats provided by the actual technology in the digital realm have always been short. That's why you see so much time and money spent on broadening and extending copyright and patents... that's the long-term moat.