4 ms·
7 looks like Vista. 10 looks like 8. There are a lot of 10/7 fans around, thus they pin for the Vista/8 look. First you complain loudly "what is this shit".
by 21 8y ago
7 looks like Vista.
10 looks like 8.
There are a lot of 10/7 fans around, thus they pin for the Vista/8 look.
First you complain loudly "what is this shit". Then when the new one comes which is basically the same as the previous, but a bit more polished you say "I love this, you should always skip one Windows version"
- SECProto 8y agoI dispute this. Vista focused heavily (on launch) on the sidebar and transparency (golly gee!). 7 and XP look very similar out-of-the-box. Honestly, I like 10 mostly. If they finished converting the settings menus to the new style, it'll feel a bit more complete. But that will also likely hide many of the useful (for "enthusiasts") settings. And if you could control updates, so it doesn't use huge amounts of memory/storage when booting when the machine has been off a week or two. Avoiding tracking would be nice too ... But I don't know much about that. Edit: my views of 10 are likely shaped by the fact that I use 1607 LTSB, which doesn't have a lot of the new windows 10 crap (app store, etc)
- deleted 8y ago[deleted]