"Predictive Coding". You don't need AI. You just need collusion between law firms i.e. to write a program, and then agree, that whatever it interprets, is the

"Predictive Coding". You don't need AI. You just need collusion between law firms i.e. to write a program, and then agree, that whatever it interprets, is the way it will be semantically enforced in court. To be clear: the study of law is bullshit; so why not take advantage of it, and simply agree, that computer generated bullshit, is what determines it... ... of course while still retaining high rates and billable hours for "attorney review" (for billable hours/padding).