4 ms·
Interesting. Considering the readme is the first thing the person sees on the github link and nothing about the license itself precludes other contracts, could
by eganist 8y ago
Interesting. Considering the readme is the first thing the person sees on the github link and nothing about the license itself precludes other contracts, could the bolded text in this context be considered a verbal contract? Or at least enforceable as such?
Edit: Actually, there was a change to the license surrounding pre-trained models and sales back in June, so it's even baked into an obvious contract. A lot of the licensing conversation here is somewhat mooted by this.
https://github.com/robbiebarrat/art-DCGAN/blob/master/LICENSE.md https://github.com/robbiebarrat/art-DCGAN/blob/master/LICENS...
- tlrobinson 8y agoObvious references "the collection", which presumably includes the piece auctioned at Christies, in a DM to Robbie in April, before that clause was added: https://twitter.com/obv_ious/status/1055352403837497344 https://twitter.com/obv_ious/status/1055352403837497344