5 ms·
The point isn’t that it’s legal or not. It’s that the creator -expressed his wishes- for how his work would be treated when he chose his license. There’s nothi
by arkades 8y ago
The point isn’t that it’s legal or not. It’s that the creator -expressed his wishes- for how his work would be treated when he chose his license.
There’s nothing unethical about respecting people’s freely chosen and publicly expressed wishes.
- yesenadam 8y agoWell, it seems to me that's stretching the meaning of words well beyond breaking point. respecting? It sounds like it was uninformed 'consent' doesn't it, like he didn't understand the licence. I get the feeling it's very hard for experts in this area to relate to people who aren't, especially without trying at all to do so, and they come over sounding like unfeeling Vulcans.