3 ms·
I'm sure they do, they just assume that the benefits of ensuring low performers don't accumulate outweigh the costs of letting go some good talent. That said,
by tspike 8y ago
I'm sure they do, they just assume that the benefits of ensuring low performers don't accumulate outweigh the costs of letting go some good talent.
That said, I think quota policies are bullshit.
- dunpeal 8y agoThe specific problem here is with the quota. I've been in teams where firing a few bad actors was definitely a good idea. I've also been in teams that were well-oiled machines where everyone was doing their part. You want to tell me I need to find 2-3 people every year to fire because of some quota dictated by some celebrity CEO with an agenda? Great way to disrupt a well-functioning team.