3 ms·
From my use of Qubes: * RAM hit is pretty big. 16gb was pretty much necessary for any type of work. * CPU hit is decent. In Qubes, one of the applications I'm
by emerongi 8y ago
From my use of Qubes:
* RAM hit is pretty big. 16gb was pretty much necessary for any type of work.
* CPU hit is decent. In Qubes, one of the applications I'm working on would build in 40s, on a "regular" OS it would take 20s.
The CPU hit is probably more variable and depends on many factors.
FWIW even though I really liked Qubes, I eventually moved away from it because maintaining the system took up a bit too much of my time. For the most part it "just works" (and huge props to the Qubes team for that!), but for example I had trouble upgrading my images at some point, which messed things up. I had backups (Qubes has a decent backup tool for which I had a bash script), but that was kind of the breaking point - I felt I had spent too much time futzing around with things. I think I used it for ~6 months. It's definitely worth trying out if you have the nerve to deal with those kinds of problems.
- lvh 8y agoAgreed on the RAM bit. I have 32GB and it's sufficient. But keep in mind we have N customers, all with Slack, so our use cases are probably a little out of the ordinary.