4 ms·

>What Google did not make public ... this is respectable of Google imho. There is no need that the whole world knows the details about this 'performance'. A bi

>What Google did not make public ... this is respectable of Google imho. There is no need that the whole world knows the details about this 'performance'. A bit low of the New York Times. But of course, sex sells.

zapita 8y ago
If you were the victim, would you also feel that it's "respectable" of Google to reward your agressor with a massive golden parachute?
- chappi42 8y ago
  'victim'? For me this term should be reserved for grave situations; what shall I say, what sometimes unfortunately now happens in Germany with knives maybe? The reward is for building Android. For such a successful platform the sum is more than justified, don't you think? In a way I feel Rubin is also a 'victim', Clinton didn't get fired back then.
  - djrogers 8y ago
    Are you seriously saying that sexual coercion is justified by how successful your mobile OS is? Holy crap! Please don’t ever - and I mean please in the most violent way possible - come near my daughters.
    - chappi42 8y ago
      I said that there are different degrees of 'victims' and that there is an over-use of 'victim'. I didn't speak about Rubin as I don't know the details and neither did I speak about justification. (No need for personal attacks. Some friendliness would help not to split society/politics/discourse)
- Udik 8y ago
  The "parachute" has nothing to do with the sexual harassment claim. I don't get why, even if Rubin were guilty, one should cancel the other. Should they ask back his salaries as well? Take his house?