> The days of needing separate constructs because of bandwidth are over > It was for ease of changes. Wat? Not solely. CSS had many goals, the primary reason

> The days of needing separate constructs because of bandwidth are over > It was for ease of changes. Wat? Not solely. CSS had many goals, the primary reason was a separate styling language that could be universally interpreted and expanded, without involving HTML (or any other standard like ECMA). HTML versions were already bogged down in semantic squabbles.