5 ms·
If you can justify dozens of CSS adjustments for IE11, it isn't much of a stretch to spend half that amount of time making something cool for (typically) higher
by aczerepinski 8y ago
If you can justify dozens of CSS adjustments for IE11, it isn't much of a stretch to spend half that amount of time making something cool for (typically) higher value Safari users as well.
- ikfmpwdsoz 8y agoWhat do you mean by "higher value"? Getting IE11 to work will net you an extra 2.85% of the market, but adding a very minor feature that's only usable by Safari users doesn't seem to be profitable at all.
- sparewalking 8y ago> only usable by Safari users doesn't seem to be profitable at all. Why is that? According to [1] Safari has 14% market share. Just the desktop version has 5%. [1] http://gs.statcounter.com/browser-market-share http://gs.statcounter.com/browser-market-share
- aczerepinski 8y agoBy higher value, I mean they spend more money.
- Insanity 8y agoNot sure if you could back that up. I assume you say this because tech-savvy people will not use IE? But that is assuming the content is aimed at this group.
- Gaelan 8y agoI imagine that they’re saying Safari users are generally of a “more valuable” demographic (maybe because they’re rich enough to afford Macs?)