3 ms·
They restricted immigration from countries who posed a threat. That threat was defined previously. You're being disingenuous in claiming it was motivated by r
by jki275 8y ago
They restricted immigration from countries who posed a threat. That threat was defined previously.
You're being disingenuous in claiming it was motivated by religion. You're incorrect in stating it restricted legal immigration. It stopped immigration by countries deemed a threat to the security of the US by Congress and the previous administration.
- freeone3000 8y agoOh, come on, there was a given number of legal immigrants and now there are fewer because of a change in government policies, that's a restriction on legal immigration. You're arguing it's justified, but stating it didn't reduce legal immigration is simply incorrect. Because it did. I also don't think it's disingenuous in stating it was motivated by religion when the circuit court for Hawaii declared it was and 4 members of the supreme court agreed.
- shaklee3 8y agoCan you provide a source for that? I tried finding information showing a decrease in legal immigration, but couldn't find any statistics that were current.