4 ms·
I don't see why it's any different than a photo-editing app that applies a watermark to the free version. It's intended to let people give the software a try,
by jawns 8y ago
I don't see why it's any different than a photo-editing app that applies a watermark to the free version. It's intended to let people give the software a try, and if it seems to meet their needs, they buy the actual product.
As for sharing the source code with the NSA, I think you have a better argument there. That said, it's kind of like helping someone install a secure lock on their door to keep out criminals, yet being willing to share a master key with police if it's a matter of life and death.
- web007 8y agoIt's not a master key, it's a blueprint of the lock with no combination or exact pin layout.
- deleted 8y ago[deleted]
- Mithorium 8y agonot the master key, the schematics to the lock maybe. Assuming no bugs, I don't see how the source code could help in any way, they may as well have downloaded the source code for openssl. He also didn't bother to verify whether it was a matter of life or death, he just immediately assumed he was helping break into a file containing the deactivation code for a bomb or something, who knows what the NSA was actually doing.