3 ms·

" Each of your complaints is because of a well-designed compromise (app quality/safety; preventing abrupt phone shutdown; removing a common failure point). You

" Each of your complaints is because of a well-designed compromise (app quality/safety; preventing abrupt phone shutdown; removing a common failure point). You may disagree with the compromises, sure." You should add "making more money" to the factors that went into this "well designed" approach. For example I don't see how not adding a MicroSD slot is nothing other than a method of forcing people into buying phones with larger internal storage (and making more money for Apple).

bitcurious 8y ago
A microSD slot would have slower read/write access, would take up much more room per GB, and would compromise waterproofing. Your point about money would be better made if you just complained about the cost of larger internal storage, except then it would be obvious - Apple is profit motivated.
- deleted 8y ago
  [deleted]
robocat 8y ago
Supporting MicroSD is most definitely a compromise. 1. I've lost photos on an Android because I used one (I bought the most reliable brand of card I could, from my most trusted store, with quite a low capacity). 2. Also the UX is crap - I know the Android universe well, and managing the options, the files, and the apps is not something I would recommend to my mum. 3. Finally any hardware interface is a point of failure (e.g. recently I had to reseat a SIM in my friend's iPhone that couldn't connect to it). I can see your argument re profit in the past, but it is becoming less valid as the minimum flash memory size is increasing. I have just bought an ZTE with 32GB because that is all I need (32GB is the minimum you can get in a new iPhone.) All these arguments that Apple is trying to "nickel and dime" their users is just tiring. Sure, they charge a lot, and they love profits, but that doesn't mean they are shitting on their users (like say cellular network providers do!) Edit: ironically it is probably because they charge so much for the device and it is so profitable that they don't need to chase every cent they could e.g. they don't provide payday loans to buy their phones!

bitcurious 8y ago

A microSD slot would have slower read/write access, would take up much more room per GB, and would compromise waterproofing. Your point about money would be better made if you just complained about the cost of larger internal storage, except then it would be obvious - Apple is profit motivated.

deleted 8y ago
[deleted]

robocat 8y ago

Supporting MicroSD is most definitely a compromise. 1. I've lost photos on an Android because I used one (I bought the most reliable brand of card I could, from my most trusted store, with quite a low capacity). 2. Also the UX is crap - I know the Android universe well, and managing the options, the files, and the apps is not something I would recommend to my mum. 3. Finally any hardware interface is a point of failure (e.g. recently I had to reseat a SIM in my friend's iPhone that couldn't connect to it). I can see your argument re profit in the past, but it is becoming less valid as the minimum flash memory size is increasing. I have just bought an ZTE with 32GB because that is all I need (32GB is the minimum you can get in a new iPhone.) All these arguments that Apple is trying to "nickel and dime" their users is just tiring. Sure, they charge a lot, and they love profits, but that doesn't mean they are shitting on their users (like say cellular network providers do!) Edit: ironically it is probably because they charge so much for the device and it is so profitable that they don't need to chase every cent they could e.g. they don't provide payday loans to buy their phones!